On Feb 25, 2004, at 8:02 PM, Tom Lane wrote:

Brandon Craig Rhodes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
But this same table suddenly becomes unwilling to use an index scan if
the target value is the result of the currval() function:

currval() is considered a volatile function, therefore it is unsafe to use in an indexscan constraint.

I suppose this is obvious, but it's volatile because *other* backends can change it while the current transaction is still in progress?


eric


The subselect hack mentioned nearby fools the planner ... at the moment.
I wouldn't guarantee that it will work indefinitely. A better solution
is to wrap currval() in a function that you lyingly claim is stable.


regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
   (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])

Reply via email to