On Sat, 2003-11-29 at 20:46, Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Why not use the inet type, which can support both formats? > > What will you do with local Unix connections?
Why not use 127.0.0.1 or the ipv6 equivalent. -- Suchandra Thapa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
