On Sun, 2003-10-12 at 00:28, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 11:17:53PM +0100, Oliver Elphick wrote: > > I haven't got any further than this, but I wonder if this is something > > that would be useful to the whole project and not just to the > > distributions. Any comments? > > None except that this is more or less how we manage multiple > installations and back ends in our test and production environments. > It works pretty well. I also know that Tom Lane uses something again > similar in order to support the apparently limitless different > permutations of installations he has available at the touch of '. > filename'.
I imagine a lot of people have such in-house set-ups. The question is whether the project itself should provide the structure to do it. -- Oliver Elphick [EMAIL PROTECTED] Isle of Wight, UK http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver GPG: 1024D/3E1D0C1C: CA12 09E0 E8D5 8870 5839 932A 614D 4C34 3E1D 0C1C ======================================== "Blessed is the man who makes the LORD his trust, who does not look to the proud, to those who turn aside to false gods." Psalms 40:4 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
