I prefer NOT to have to scroll down to the bottom of an email anyway. I think discussion list emails like ours need to be like your medical records, the most important, recent stuff is at the top.

I'm not exactly sure what full quoting is.

David Olbersen wrote:

-----Original Message-----
From: David W Noon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 4:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] move to usenet?

I agree that many messages are not formatted according to Usenet
conventions, but I normally attribute that to Windows users who know
nothing about the Internet. Thus, top-posting and full-quoting are rife all
across Usenet.



David,


What is the point of bottom posting anymore? I thought it had to do with turn-around time so that you could re-read whatever it is you wrote a "long time ago". I highly doubt you would know, but is there an easy way to make Outlook 2000 (not Express) bottom post? I've searched groups.google.com for it and found only things like "Copy & paste your signature", etc.

Full-quoting is just a pain when it comes to searching on google, since a reply may only consist of quoted messages and then a "read the whole message" link.

--------------------------
David Olbersen iGuard Engineer
St. Bernard Software


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings





---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to