On Fri, 2003-08-15 at 08:38, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, expect wrote: > > > On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 00:23:34 -0400 (EDT) > > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Uh, we do that so folks get the replies quicker. > > > > Uh, why not get a better mail server? Seriously it seems that it really is > > very slow. Is it under powered? The software doesn't scale well? Or is it > > something else? > > I periodically check my full message headers to make sure of speed, and > other then messages hat required moderator approval, delivery times are <5 > minutes ... what are you seeing?
For me, at least, most (98%) of emails arrive "immediately". However, since I'm on a cable modem, "double mails" are just a hassle; I delete the extras. People on dial-up, especially those who are on metered access, may not appreciate the extra download time, though. In Evolution, I am able to do "Actions->Reply to List" Outlook 97 doesn't have such a feature, but I'm sure that MozMail, Pine and Mutt do. -- +---------------------------------------------------------------+ | Ron Johnson, Jr. Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | Jefferson, LA USA | | | | "Man, I'm pretty. Hoo Hah!" | | Johnny Bravo | +---------------------------------------------------------------+ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
