It compiles, but does not link because of the missing fork/exec and signals.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Hermit Hacker wrote: > On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Robert Treat wrote: > > > depends on what you mean by any. I believe that the standard tarball > > will compile under windows, but to what extent it will actually run I > > couldn't say. This release is not intended for native use on windows > > (that had to be pushed back to 7.5), though it will certainly run via > > cygwin. > > Ummm ... will it compile? I thought that the issue with the Windows > native port was that it wouldn't yet ... something about fork() vs exec() > that Bruce was working on? > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly > -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
