Good to learn PG, in fact, is faster than SAP DB. But how the figure 2.487 comes up? A single select statement or something else?
--------- Original Message --------- DATE: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 11:00:30 From: Richard Huxton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Mike Mascari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED],Jean-Christian Imbeault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >On Thursday 24 July 2003 04:42, Mike Mascari wrote: >> Vernon Smith wrote: >> > The unknown is only in North American, but not in Europe. >> > That is what I learnt more than a year ago. It has some >> > advantagess over PG from on-line information. It is >> > quicker than PG for one. >> >> No. PG is 2.5 times faster. >> >> See how easy it is for people to make unsubstantiated claims? > >Be fair Mike, it's actually 2.487 times faster > >Unsubstantiated claims should be implausibly accurate too ;-) > >-- > Richard Huxton > Archonet Ltd > >---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your > joining column's datatypes do not match > ____________________________________________________________ Get advanced SPAM filtering on Webmail or POP Mail ... Get Lycos Mail! http://login.mail.lycos.com/r/referral?aid=27005 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
