Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > Bruce Momjian writes: > > > > > > Break the SQL code that has been implemented for prior versions?? > > > > Bummer ;((. > > > > > > Yes, but we don't follow the MySQL behavior, which we copied when we > > > added LIMIT. Seems we should agree with their implementation. > > > > Isn't it much worse to not follow PostgreSQL behaviour than to not follow > > MySQL behaviour? > > Well, it was on the TODO list and people complained while porting their > MySQL applications. We clearly made a mistake in the initial > implementation. > > The question is do we fix it or continue with a different > implementation. Because we have the separate LIMIT and OFFSET we can > fix it while giving people a solution that will work for all versions. > If we don't fix it, all MySQL queries that are ported will be broken.
But it seems absurd to trouble existent PG users instead. regrads, Hiroshi Inoue ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
