Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> Hiroshi Inoue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> I'd say you shouldn't release it at all.
> 
> > As far as I see I'm not releasing it.
> 
> Oh, I hadn't looked closely at reindex_index.  Hmm... okay, you are
> holding the lock acquired there.

Yes reindex_index is guarding itself.

> But you're still acquiring it way too
> late for my taste.  All of the setup work in reindex_relation seems to
> be done without any lock.

OK I would add a heap_open() to reindex_relation.
Please wait a while. I've not reorganized my local
source yet.

regards,
Hiroshi Inoue

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to