On Tue, 14 Aug 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
> Lee Kindness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Is the bug system at:
> > http://www.ca.postgresql.org/bugs/
> > actively in use? I recently reported the following bug:
> > http://www.ca.postgresql.org/bugs/bugs.php?4~415
> > and after doing so browsed through a number of earlier bugs it appears
> > that the vast majority are still 'unassigned' and not evaluated after
> > a long period of time (like over a year)! Surely if this system is
> > being ignored it should be removed from the website...
>
> It's not being ignored, exactly --- the part of it that is actually
> useful is that bug reports entered via the webform are spit out to the
> pgsql-bugs mailing list. Which the developers do read, and respond to.
> (I see your ecpg bug report on the list, BTW.) But no one is
> maintaining the bug database in the sense of marking stuff done.
>
> I hadn't realized that there was a publicly-visible database attached
> to the webform, actually. Perhaps we should not make the database
> visible, if we're not going to update it. Vince, what do you think?
If we're not going to update it then I agree, although updating it is
rather trivial. It's a function/feature that's already built in. So
I guess it's your call, 'cuze it's just as trivial for me to disable
that part.
Vince.
--
==========================================================================
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pop4.net
56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking
Online Campground Directory http://www.camping-usa.com
Online Giftshop Superstore http://www.cloudninegifts.com
==========================================================================
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
