On 10/18/2017 08:49 AM, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 10/18/2017 10:16 AM, Igal @ Lucee.org wrote:
On 10/18/2017 7:45 AM, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 10/18/2017 09:34 AM, Igal @ Lucee.org wrote:
A bit off-topic here, but why upgrade to 9.6 when you can upgrade to 10.0?

There's no way we're going to put an x.0.0 version into production.

Then think of it as 9.7.0 but with an easier name to pronounce ;)

No .0 is going into production...


I am not sure why this is even a question. There are plenty of businesses that can risk the deployment of a .0 release but there are also *MANY THAT CAN NOT*. The proper way to do this is to have a staging server running the .0 release that gets beaten on by the application for a few months and reports anything back to the community they find.

JD



--
Command Prompt, Inc. || http://the.postgres.company/ || @cmdpromptinc

PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Advocate: @amplifypostgres || Learn: https://pgconf.us
*****     Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own.   *****


--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

Reply via email to