> On Oct 10, 2017, at 08:05, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> You're right, I was testing on HEAD, so that patch might've obscured
> the problem. But the code looks like it could still be O(N^2) in
> some cases. Will look again later.
I was able to reproduce this on 9.5.9 with the following:
DO $$
DECLARE
i int := 1;
BEGIN
FOR i IN 1..12000 LOOP
BEGIN
PERFORM f();
i := i / 0;
EXCEPTION
WHEN division_by_zero THEN
END;
END LOOP;
END;
$$ language plpgsql;
where f() is:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION f() RETURNS VOID AS $$
BEGIN
CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE test_table ON COMMIT DROP AS SELECT i FROM
generate_series(1, 100) i;
END:
$$ language plpgsql;
A couple of observations:
-- In this version, I couldn't do a select * from pg_locks() on the secondary
without getting an out-of-shared-memory error.
-- If I increased max_locks_per_transaction to 15000, the problem didn't occur,
even if I bumped up the number of iterations in the first to 20000.
--
-- Christophe Pettus
x...@thebuild.com
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
