> > I'm not sure why we've never got round to providing such a thing > in core ... probably lack of consensus on what to name the reverse > operator. You'd need to support regex cases as well, so there's > more than one operator name to come up with. >
Interesting! It seems like one "simple" possiblity would be to allow ANY() to be on either side...or would that muck up the Grammar too badly or have weird edge cases where it doesn't make sense? > > regards, tom lane >
