On Thursday, July 27, 2017, David G. Johnston <david.g.johns...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thursday, July 27, 2017, Vincenzo Romano <vincenzo.rom...@notorand.it > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','vincenzo.rom...@notorand.it');>> wrote: >> >> The main difference is that with RETURNS SETOF RECORD I still get the >> "usual"(tm) function argument list in the usual place: between two >> parentheses. >> It's a matter of style. And a consistent one. >> But I still don't get the point for not having it for a single column. >> >> > Docs say: " When there are OUT or INOUT parameters, the RETURNS clause > can be omitted. ". Sounds like you should you do just that. > > Except you'd have no where to put the "setof" modifier...So, yeah, you probably aren't going to personal style preference catered to here. David J.
