On 24/07/2017 10:02, Tim Uckun wrote:
I have read many articles about dealing with hierarchies in postgres including 
nested sets, ltree, materialized paths, using arrays as parentage,  CTEs etc 
but nobody talks about the following scenario.

Say I have a hierarchy like this

1
1.1
1.1.1
1.1.2
1.2
1.3
2
2.1

In this hierarchy the order is very important and I want to run frequent(ish) 
re-ordering of both subsets and entire trees and even more frequent inserts.

Scenario 1: I want to insert a child into the 1.1 subtree. The next item should be 1.1.3 and I can't figure out any other way to do this other than to subquery the children and to figure out the max child ID, add one to it which is a race condition waiting to happen.

Scenario 2: I now decide the recently inserted item is the second most important so I reset the ID to 1.1.2 and then increment 1.1.2 (and possibly everything below). Again this is both prone to race conditions and involves a heavy update.

Is there a better way to deal with this or is the complexity unavoidable?
Maybe you could try a hybrid approach with genealogical paths, represented by 
arrays, and a (possible bidirectional) linked list storing the siblings of the 
same parent.
Basically what you'd normally want is to convert your problem into something 
that can be represented in such a way that it can run fast on postgresql.

I should state that like most database reads will be much more frequent than 
writes and inserts will be more frequent than updates (re-ordering)


--
Achilleas Mantzios
IT DEV Lead
IT DEPT
Dynacom Tankers Mgmt



--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

Reply via email to