Thanks for the responses. For me, using the 9.2 binary was the winner. Shoulda thought of that!
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 1:30 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Generally speaking, it helps a lot if you don't insist on restoring the > output in a single transaction. In this case, that would allow the > restore to ignore the new parameters and move on. > > regards, tom lane > Well sure, I can see it increases your chances of getting _something_ restored. But there's also a lot to be said for ensuring that _all_ your data restored, and did so correctly, no? Cheers, Ken -- AGENCY Software A Free Software data system By and for non-profits *http://agency-software.org/ <http://agency-software.org/>* *https://agency-software.org/demo/client <https://agency-software.org/demo/client>* ken.tan...@agency-software.org (253) 245-3801 Subscribe to the mailing list <agency-general-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net?body=subscribe> to learn more about AGENCY or follow the discussion.
