jonathan vanasco <postg...@2xlp.com> writes:
> What I noticed when checking stats earlier, is that although
> `idx_test_foo_id_asc` is the same as the PKEY... it was used about 10x more
> than the pkey.
> Does anyone know of this is just random (perhaps due to the name being sorted
> earlier) or there is some other reason that index would be selected ?
It's almost certainly just an artifact. The planner considers a table's
indexes in OID order. I don't recall offhand whether it would keep the
first or last of a series of identical-cost plans, but it'd be one or the
other of those behaviors; it would not continue to consider both indexes
once it noticed the plans were the same.
One thing that could favor a newer index is that it probably has somewhat
less bloat in it, resulting in a fractionally smaller cost estimate. This
doesn't make it better in any absolute sense; reindexing the older index
would reverse that preference, at least for a time.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
