On 04/06/2017 11:18 PM, Tom DalPozzo wrote:
Hi, 2017-04-06 21:51 GMT+02:00 Adrian Klaver <adrian.kla...@aklaver.com <mailto:adrian.kla...@aklaver.com>>: On 04/04/2017 11:52 PM, Tom DalPozzo wrote: Hi, 2017-04-05 1:55 GMT+02:00 Adrian Klaver <adrian.kla...@aklaver.com <mailto:adrian.kla...@aklaver.com> <mailto:adrian.kla...@aklaver.com <mailto:adrian.kla...@aklaver.com>>>: On 04/04/2017 07:45 AM, Tom DalPozzo wrote: Postgres version? 9.6.1 Hi, I had two replication slots on my primary. Slaves off and (around 800) WALs kept as expected. Slaves off means?: You replication set up from the master to the slaves(how many?). Then you disconnected the slaves how? I have 2 slaves configured with async replication but they were down when I dropped the slots. So the 800 WALs number mean you have wal_keep_segments set to 800? No, wal_keep_segments is commented. 800 is the rough number of files I saw in xlog dir before dropping the slots. What are your settings for?: archive_mode archive_mode is off archive_command it's set as I tested it some months ago but now archive_mode is off Do you see anything in the Postgres log that might apply? No, nothing
I am not sure what is going on. Are the number of WAL files still growing? -- Adrian Klaver adrian.kla...@aklaver.com -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
