On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> John Iliffe <john.ili...@iliffe.ca> writes:
> > When the programme exited it left another postmaster.pid file so I
> deleted
> > that one too.
>
> You haven't shown us the program actually exiting, and basically the only
> way to get the postmaster to exit without removing its pid file is to
> kill -9 it.  Now I am suspicious that you in fact haven't killed any
> postmasters, but only removed their pidfiles out from under them, which is
> an incredibly dangerous thing to do.  Check "ps ax" output to see if any
> postgres processes are lurking in background.
>
>                         regards, tom lane
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>

Hey, looking closer, I see this in your original log

LOG:  database system is ready to accept connections
LOG:  autovacuum launcher started

That means Postgres WAS started, just that the postgres port was unable to
be opened.
So if you do a pg_ctl stop, change the port in postgresql.conf to 5433 (or
5434) and then attempt
to restart, is your problem resolved?

-- 
*Melvin Davidson*
I reserve the right to fantasize.  Whether or not you
wish to share my fantasy is entirely up to you.

Reply via email to