On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> John Iliffe <john.ili...@iliffe.ca> writes: > > When the programme exited it left another postmaster.pid file so I > deleted > > that one too. > > You haven't shown us the program actually exiting, and basically the only > way to get the postmaster to exit without removing its pid file is to > kill -9 it. Now I am suspicious that you in fact haven't killed any > postmasters, but only removed their pidfiles out from under them, which is > an incredibly dangerous thing to do. Check "ps ax" output to see if any > postgres processes are lurking in background. > > regards, tom lane > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general > Hey, looking closer, I see this in your original log LOG: database system is ready to accept connections LOG: autovacuum launcher started That means Postgres WAS started, just that the postgres port was unable to be opened. So if you do a pg_ctl stop, change the port in postgresql.conf to 5433 (or 5434) and then attempt to restart, is your problem resolved? -- *Melvin Davidson* I reserve the right to fantasize. Whether or not you wish to share my fantasy is entirely up to you.