On 3 March 2017 at 12:17, Sven R. Kunze <srku...@mail.de> wrote: > On 03.03.2017 11:43, Geoff Winkless wrote: > > One alternative would be to make to_date accept all language variants of > months simultaneously. A quick search of google suggests that there aren't > any overlaps between languages (ie where one language uses "Foo" for March > and another uses "Foo" for May), although you would have to do some more > intense research to be sure. As far as I can see there's no other reason > why to_date would need to be marked as stable/volatile, is there? > > > it seems there are overlapping short months: >
Trust the Balkan states to find something to disagree over :) Oh well, that scrubs that idea then. Geoff
