On Jan 12, 2017, at 5:52 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote: > On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 2:19 PM, bto...@computer.org > <bto...@broadstripe.net> wrote: >> >> Review manual section 7.8.2. Data-Modifying Statements in WITH >> >> >> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/queries-with.html > > this. > > with data as (delete from foo where ... returning * ) insert into > foo_backup select * from data;
Thanks, btober and merlin. that's exactly what i want. On Jan 12, 2017, at 4:45 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote: > Maybe I am missing something, but why do the UPDATE? > Why not?: > ... > With an index on record_timestamp. That's actually the production deployment that we're trying to optimize. Depending on the size of the table (rows, width) it performs "less than great", even with the index on record_timestamp. The UPDATE actually worked faster in most situations. I honestly don't know why (the only thing that makes sense to me is server-load)... but the update + bool test ended up being (much) faster than the timestamp comparison. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
