Re: [GENERAL] checkpoint clarifications needed

[Tom DalPozzo]

>
> Hi, I had already read that doc but I can't  answer clearly to my
>> questions 2,4 and 5.
>>
>
> The answer would seem to depend on what you consider 'a consistency state
> position'. Is it possible to be more explicit about what you mean?
>
>>
>> Hi, I meant a position such that, if you replay up to it, then the DB is
in a consistent state (transactions done entirely or not a t all...).
But, as Alvaro wrote, any position is ok
Thank you very much
Pupillo