On 12/11/2016 11:34 PM, Chris Withers wrote:
> On 01/12/2016 12:12, Francisco Olarte wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Chris Withers
>> <ch...@simplistix.co.uk> wrote:
>>> So, first observation: if I make room nullable, the exclude
>>> constraint does
>>> not apply for rows that have a room of null. I guess that's to be
>>> expected,
>>> right?
>>
>> I would expect it, given:
>>
>> n=> select null=null, null<>null, not (null=null);
>>  ?column? | ?column? | ?column?
>> ----------+----------+----------
>>           |          |
>> (1 row)
>>
>> Those are nulls,
> 
> Yes, it's a shame psql has the same repr for null and empty-string ;-)

test=# select NULL;                                                             
                                                                                
                   
 ?column?                                                                       
                                                                                
                   
----------                                                                      
                                                                                
                   
                                                                                
                                                                                
                   
(1 row)                                                                         
                                                                                
                   
                                                                                
                                                                                
                   
test=# \pset null 'NULL'
Null display is "NULL".                                                         
                                                                                
                   

test=# select NULL;                                                             
                                                                                
              
 ?column?                                                                       
                                                                                
                   
----------                                                                      
                                                                                
                   
 NULL                                                                           
                                                                                
                   
(1 row)                   

> 
>> n=> select (null=null) is null, (null<>null) is null, (not
>> (null=null)) is null;
>>  ?column? | ?column? | ?column?
>> ----------+----------+----------
>>  t        | t        | t
>> (1 row)
>>
>> I.e., the same happens with a nullable unique column, you can have one
>> of each not null values and as many nulls as you want.
>>
>> SQL null is a strange beast.
> 
> Sure, I think that was the answer I was expecting but not hoping for...
> 
> However, my "next question" was the one I was really hoping for help with:
> 
> Working with the exclude constraint example from
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/rangetypes.html:
> 
> CREATE EXTENSION btree_gist;
> CREATE TABLE room_reservation (
>     room text,
>     during tsrange,
>     EXCLUDE USING GIST (room WITH =, during WITH &&)
> );
> 
> Next question: if lots of rows have open-ended periods
> (eg: [, 2010-01-01 15:00) or [2010-01-01 14:00,)), how does that affect
> the performance of the btree gist index backing the exclude constraint?
> 
> Tom Lane made a comment on here but never followed up with a definitive
> answer. Can anyone else help?
> 
> cheers,
> 
> Chris
> 
> 


-- 
Adrian Klaver
adrian.kla...@aklaver.com


-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

Reply via email to