Thanks Kevin, that makes sense. Yeah, I understand the architectural
difference a bit more now. I also read that when you change a column
which is not index, all the indexes for that row need to be updated
anyway. Is that correct?

On 7 December 2016 at 05:27,  <kbran...@pwhome.com> wrote:
> Samuel Williams <space.ship.travel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> So, uh, my main question was, does MySQL add null values to an index, and is 
>> this different from Postgres...
>
> Samuel,
>
> A quick google says that Mysql does index NULLs. Ask a Mysql group to get a 
> more definitive answer.
>
> More relevant to your original question, I'll go out on a limb as I struggle 
> to recall a fuzzy memory.
>
> The difference between Mysql and Postgresql is fundamental architecture, so 
> yes the index creation will be very different, as others have said. IIRC (and 
> I may not be), Mysql stores where a row is on the disk via the PK index. That 
> means that secondary indexes point to the proper row in the PK index, which 
> does mean that when you use a secondary index to get data that there is a 
> double look up. They claim that's faster for updates and other stuff because 
> a change to a row only requires 1 index to be changed.
>
> Postgresql stores the direct disk location in each index, which slows down 
> updates a little, but makes selects faster (and I find this really amusing 
> because so many people say Mysql is great because it's fast at reads, yet 
> architecturally PG is faster). If I'm wrong here, I'm sure I'll be corrected. 
> :)
>
> So you can see that Mysql indexes should be smaller than PG indexes because 
> of what they carry. Personally, I think the diff is small enough I'm not 
> going to worry about it, but math is such that some numbers are smaller than 
> others. :) So that should explain what you're seeing.
>
> My opinion is that you shouldn't worry about the index size. Which DB does 
> what you want the best? That obviously depends on what your needs are, but 
> after using both Mysql and PG, I'll take PG whenever possible, thank you. 
> Mysql has gotten better over the last 5-8 years, but there are still many 
> pits of quicksand ready to swallow you up there that PG doesn't have. If you 
> know where those pits are and/or don't travel into that part of the jungle, 
> great for you; personally, I prefer to get the job done without having to 
> watch where I'm walking. ;)
>
> HTH,
> Kevin
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general


-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

Reply via email to