George <pinkisntw...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 6:58 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> What
>> do you get for
>> select * from pg_stats where tablename = 'wg3ppbm_userpartner';
>> and likewise for wg3ppbm_partner?
> It is a wide table. Do you want me to dump csv here?
Shouldn't be *that* wide, with only one row in the underlying table ;-)
Maybe psql \x format would be suitable.
> In the meantime, with the help of the folks at #postgresql I was able
> to wisen up the query planner by using either one of the following two
> settings:
> SET enable_seqscan = false
> SET cpu_tuple_cost = 0.1
Well, that proves it is considering the indexscan option. But there is
something funny going on, if you have stats for these tables and yet
you're getting a default rowcount estimate.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
