On Oct 28, 2016, at 13:50 , David G. Johnston <david.g.johns...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On its face the statement "DISTINCT ON removes results" is not at all > surprising given its definition.
What is surprising is that it removes *all* results…
On Oct 28, 2016, at 13:50 , David G. Johnston <david.g.johns...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On its face the statement "DISTINCT ON removes results" is not at all > surprising given its definition.
What is surprising is that it removes *all* results…