On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 04:35:35PM +0200, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote: > På torsdag 13. oktober 2016 kl. 16:09:34, skrev Bruce Momjian > <br...@momjian.us > >: > > On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 10:14:08AM +0200, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote: > > I would assume that having pg_largeobject in a separate tablespace is > more and > > more common these days, having real-cheap SAN vs. fast-SSD for normal > tables/ > > indexes/wal. > > So common that no one has ever asked for this feature before? > > Sometimes one gets the feeling that one is the only one in the universe doing > something one considers "quite common":-)
Yes, I often feel the same way. :-) Like, why am I the only person who thinks this is a natural thing to do. I find a lot of bugs that way. :-) -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription + -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
