W dniu 2016-08-18 14:19:25 użytkownik Ilya Kazakevich 
<ilya.kazakev...@jetbrains.com> napisał:
> >Thank you. So if that is the reason changing the fillfactor parameter should
> >help?
> 
> Fillfactor is not about rebalancing, but about page split. If you have many 
> insertions you may decrease fillfactor to minimize  page splits, but I am not 
> sure it will help in your case.  But you should try)
> Better approach is to create index _after_ insertion, but it is not always 
> possible.
> 
> 
> Ilya Kazakevich
> 
> JetBrains
> http://www.jetbrains.com
> The Drive to Develop
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
> 

>From link you have pasted:
"Both insertions and deletions are fast as long as space is available on a 
block. If an insertion won't fit on the block, then some free space on some 
nearby block must be found and the auxiliary indices adjusted. The hope is that 
enough space is nearby such that a lot of blocks do not need to be reorganized."

and from postgres documentation:
fillfactor

    The fillfactor for an index is a percentage that determines how full the 
index method will try to pack index pages. For B-trees, leaf pages are filled 
to this percentage during initial index build, and also when extending the 
index at the right (adding new largest key values)

So spliting happens when no room left on the page. But before that room can be 
used for further insertions...




-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

Reply via email to