Il 28/07/2016 15:33, David G. Johnston
ha scritto:
The result is too big to be sane... so there *must* be something wrong Yes, my "1 GB" is related to max_wal_file_size, that from 9.5 came over checkpoint_segment. That's the variable. How many segments do I expect to have? (jumping from 9.1 (current) to 9.5 (new) documentation and having a bit of confusion in my head...) Got one, in fact. The statement to *absolutely* not use ramdisk with wal files resolved almost all of my doubts.
Thanks Moreno |
- [GENERAL] WAL directory size calculation Moreno Andreo
- Re: [GENERAL] WAL directory size calculation David G. Johnston
- Re: [GENERAL] WAL directory size calculation Moreno Andreo
- Re: [GENERAL] WAL directory size calculation Jeff Janes
- Re: [GENERAL] WAL directory size calculation Andreas Kretschmer
- Re: [GENERAL] WAL directory size calculation Moreno Andreo
- Re: [GENERAL] WAL directory size calculation Jan Wieck
- Re: [GENERAL] WAL directory size calculation Francisco Olarte
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [GENERAL] WAL directory size c... Moreno Andreo
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [GENERAL] WAL directory si... John R Pierce
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [GENERAL] WAL director... Moreno Andreo
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [GENERAL] WAL dir... FarjadFarid(ChkNet)
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [GENERAL] WAL... Moreno Andreo