> > >> > Not sure that would have mattered for the reasons below. > > You might want to take a look at the below: > > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/static/wal.html > > In particular: > > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/static/wal-intro.html > > Short version WAL files are essential to restoring and on the originating > server are recycled, subject to the configuration parameters explained here: > > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/static/wal-configuration.html > > So the wal archiving you have set up is not storing everything, it removes > older files over time? >
Yes... it removes... I've changed to store them for up to 72h. I'll restart the process now, by using stream instead fletch. Let's see.... =\
