On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 8:53 PM, Andreas Joseph Krogh <andr...@visena.com> wrote:
> På søndag 29. mai 2016 kl. 19:49:06, skrev Oleg Bartunov < > obartu...@gmail.com>: > > [snip] >> >> I want to run 9.6 beta in production right now because of this:-) >> > > wait-wait :) We'd be happy to have feedback from production, of course, > but please, wait a bit. We are adding support of sorting posting list/tree > not by item pointer as in gin, but make use of additional information, for > example, timestamp, which will provide additional speedup to the existing > one. > > > Awesome! > > > > Also, we are sure there are some bugs :) > > > He he, I reported 1st issue: https://github.com/postgrespro/rum/issues/1 > > Would be cool to see this fixed so I actually could have a sip of the > rum:-) > It's not easy to fix this. We don't want rum depends on btree_gin, so probably the easiest way is to have separate operator <=> in rum. > > -- > *Andreas Joseph Krogh* > CTO / Partner - Visena AS > Mobile: +47 909 56 963 > andr...@visena.com > www.visena.com > <https://www.visena.com> > >
