Hi, I need to understand something: Lets assume I have a table t5 with 1'000'000 rows:
(postgres@[local]:5432) [sample] > select count(*) from t5; count --------- 1000000 (1 row) Time: 2363.834 ms (postgres@[local]:5432) [sample] > I get the file for that table: postgres@pg_essentials_p1:/u02/pgdata/PG1/base/16422/ [PG1] oid2name -d sample -t t5 >From database "sample": Filenode Table Name ---------------------- 32809 t5 Then I delete the file: postgres@pg_essentials_p1:/u02/pgdata/PG1/base/16422/ [PG1] rm 32809 When doing the count(*) on the table again: (postgres@[local]:5432) [sample] > select count(*) from t5; count --------- 1000000 (1 row) No issue in the log. This is probably coming from the cache, isn't it? Is this intended and safe? Then I restart the instance and do the select again: 2016-05-30 19:25:20.633 CEST - 9 - 2777 - - @ FATAL: could not open file "base/16422/32809": No such file or directory 2016-05-30 19:25:20.633 CEST - 10 - 2777 - - @ CONTEXT: writing block 8192 of relation base/16422/32809 (postgres@[local]:5432) [sample] > select count(*) from t5; count -------- 437920 (1 row) Can someone please tell me the intention behind that? From my point of view this is dangerous. If nobody is monitoring the log (which sadly is the case in reality) nobody will notice that only parts of the table are there. Wouldn't it be much more safe to raise an error as soon as the table is touched? PostgreSQL version: (postgres@[local]:5432) [sample] > select version(); -[ RECORD 1 ]---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- version | PostgreSQL 9.4.4 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-4), 64-bit Thanks in advance Daniel
