On May 12, 2016, at 4:57 AM, sangeetha <tune2san...@gmail.com> wrote:
Currently , I am using "With hold" cursor. In our case , the With hold cursor is used to fetch the next record of the given primary key . Can you explain your use case. If i understand with hold correctly, it is typically used to preserve locks even after commit , so as to get a consistent view of data. The performance is very slow for large data set. Can you provide me some alternative ways like having own copy of table , or optimization for With hold cursor? Thanks and Regards, S.Sangeetha -- View this message in context: http://postgresql.nabble.com/Alternate-or-Optimization-for-with-hold-cursor-tp5903211.html Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
