On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Guyren Howe <guy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The SQL language is terrible but we can live with it. > If anything, and especially something as pervasive and esoteric as SQL, makes you question your desire to live please get help. > But the answer to "Are there any relational data stores that offer > eventual consistency, easy distribution, schema-on-demand or any such > things a large modern application can use?" appears to be no. And that's > just awful. > > The axiom "a bird in hand is worth two in the bush" comes to mind here. This applies even if the bird-in-hand is ugly and the glimpses of the ones in the bush indicates they are beautiful. David J.
