"Bannert  Matthias" <bann...@kof.ethz.ch> writes:
> Fwiw, I was not stubbornly insisting on nesting operators. Actually I 
> switched from "=>" to the hstore function cause
> a note in the manual said it was deprecated 
> (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/hstore.html). Somehow I must have 
> understand that note the wrong way. 
> What's your take on that operator being deprecated? 

That's the old SQL operator (which is not even there anymore) that's
equivalent to the hstore(text,text) constructor function, ie
"text => text returning hstore".  It's quite a different concept
from the => notation inside an hstore literal.  That is:
        'foo'::text => 'bar'::text
is not like
        '"foo" => "bar"'::hstore
even though they have the same end result.

                        regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

Reply via email to