Jeff Janes wrote: >> I am curious because of "while xmax is the transaction ID that >> *removed* the row". > > "marked for removal" would be more accurate. If the row were actually > physically removed, it would no longer have a xmax to set.
Yes, thanks for the clarification. I was thinking "logically removed", but I realize my wording was confusing. Yours, Laurenz Albe -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
