On 03/02/2016 09:06 AM, Mark E. Haase wrote:
I can `SET search_path TO "$user",foo,bar,public` and the first path
element will expand to the current user.
Can I do the same for `pg_dump -n`? I've tried many variations but none
of them appear to work:
pg_dump -U myuser -n '($user|foo|bar|public)' ...
pg_dump -U myuser -n '("$user"|foo|bar|public)' ...
pg_dump -U myuser -n '(\$user|foo|bar|public)' ...
I can't tell if I'm doing something wrong or if $user expansion is just
some magic in SET that doesn't exist in pg_dump or `\dn`.
(The workaround is obvious, of course: replace $user with the value of
the -U argument . This is a question of curiosity, not practicality.)
Also, is there any difference between `pg_dump -n '(foo|bar)'` and
`pg_dump -n foo -n bar`? In my narrow testing, they produce identical
results.
Not as far I can see:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/interactive/app-pgdump.html#PG-DUMP-EXAMPLES
To dump all schemas whose names start with east or west and end in gsm,
excluding any schemas whose names contain the word test:
$ pg_dump -n 'east*gsm' -n 'west*gsm' -N '*test*' mydb > db.sql
The same, using regular expression notation to consolidate the switches:
$ pg_dump -n '(east|west)*gsm' -N '*test*' mydb > db.sql
Thanks,
--
Mark E. Haase
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.kla...@aklaver.com
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
