On 26 February 2016 at 20:02, Leonardo M. Ramé <l.r...@griensu.com> wrote:
> > El 26/02/16 a las 15:55, John R Pierce escribió: > >> On 2/26/2016 10:29 AM, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote: >> >>> Hi, I created a Postgres_FDW table (TABLE_A) and need to do an update on >>> that table. >>> >>> As TABLE_A has a trigger, and the trigger does an insert on another >>> table (TABLE_B), I had to create another foreign table called TABLE_B, >>> that's ok. >>> >> >> >> that trigger is defined on the server that actually has table_a, right? >> or did you define a trigger on the FDW table ? >> >> Hi John, yes, the trigger is only defined on the foreign server. > > Let's check we get this right! You have two "real" table in the remote server with a trigger doing it's job on them and on the local server you have and FDW on each remote table. Right? Regards, Sándor Ezt az e-mailt egy Avast védelemmel rendelkező, vírusmentes számítógépről küldték. www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> <#DDB4FAA8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
