On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 10:08 AM, John R Pierce <pie...@hogranch.com> wrote:
> On 2/10/2016 8:51 AM, Pierre Chevalier Géologue wrote: > > PPS: how should I behave on this list: should I systematically "reply to > all", or just "reply" to the list? I'm used to a number of mailing lists > where a simple "reply" automatically replies to the list, and the rule > obliges you to **only** use "reply". > > > > Thunderbird offers me both 'reply' and 'reply list' buttons for the > messages on this list. > > most of the lists I'm on, a simple reply IS a reply list, as they wish to > encourage discussions rather than private responses. I personally dislike > 'reply all' as I'm ON the list so why send me another CC ? > > It lets me distinguish between the list threads that I haven't responded to and those that I have. >From observation pretty much everyone here uses reply-to-all...I suspect for a similar reason. David J.