Why must it be free of personal comments? "Tom, I like the way you handed this issue. Good work!" Is a personal comment.
Why do we need lists? What specifically is wrong with "that focuses on the tech and not the person" version? Jim On January 11, 2016 6:04:03 PM EST, "Joshua D. Drake" <j...@commandprompt.com> wrote: >On 01/11/2016 02:54 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> "Joshua D. Drake" <j...@commandprompt.com> writes: >>> How about we meet in the middle: >> >>> A safe, respectful, productive and collaborative environment is free >>> of non-technical or personal comments related to gender, sexual >>> orientation, disability, physical appearance, body size, race or >>> personal attacks. >> >> That's not really meeting in the middle: it still specifies exactly >> one set of disapproved topics. Might be OK if it read like >> "... personal comments, for example ones related to gender, ..." > >Tom, > >Oh good point. I like that. So: > >A safe, respectful, productive and collaborative environment is free >of non-technical or personal comments, for example ones related to >gender, sexual orientation, disability, physical appearance, body size, > >race or personal attacks. > >Sincerely, > >JD > > >-- >Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 503-667-4564 >PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development. >Announcing "I'm offended" is basically telling the world you can't >control your own emotions, so everyone else should do it for you. > > >-- >Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) >To make changes to your subscription: >http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
