Geoff, > If there were a CoC that would explicitly disallow occasional lighthearted > humour to a non-development list that is intended to offend no-one then I > would most definitely remove myself from such a project.
> Some may consider that a positive thing, but I would like to think that in > the main I have at least tried to help in the small ways that I could. > Your post, on the other hand, is clearly intended to censure a fellow > contributor to the list, which I find far more offensive. I guess that's the > problem with CoCs, because to some people what's reasonable behaviour is > utterly unacceptable to others. > For what it's worth, I would consider my post to be no less on topic for > postgres-general than the original topic. Even notwithstanding that I think > it would be a complete waste of time and resources I don't consider this the > correct place to hold such a conversation: > there is a -docs list, after all. But since I'm able to simply ignore and > delete those posts that don't interest me, I didn't really see any point in > saying anything. > Geoff The Coc allows light-hearted humor, I'm so disappointed you didn't get my clever punning in my last email. I thought it was a treasure. Now while what you said is fine for this list, it's questionable it adds value to this discussion. On further observation, I realize it can be used as a testcase to test the strength of this Coc. So I stand corrected this is quite relevant and useful to this discussion. In fact, I think we should package all these and use them in regression tests for this Coc. Thanks, Regina -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
