Hi All,
        9.3 version using pgadmin3

Query like below,20 columns fetching
 SELECT col1,col2,col3,...col.20
                                   FROM detail i,
                                    adjdetail ia,
                                  WHERE i.trans_id = ia.detail_id AND
(i.event = ANY (ARRAY[21, 22, 3, 5]))
created indexes on  where clause declared columns.

Taking a lot of time above ..?any help apprectiated !.

I have total 4 gb ram,i changed below in postgres.conf

shared_buffers--1024mb
temp_bufffers=8mb
work_mem=200mb
maintanace_work_mem=500mb
seq_page_cost = 1.0
random_page_cost = 5.0
effective_cache_size = 1024MB



On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 11:12 PM, Adrian Klaver <adrian.kla...@aklaver.com>
wrote:

> On 11/17/2015 04:18 AM, Ramesh T wrote:
>
>> the query is big it's selecting 20 rows from two table like i mentioned
>> above exaplain analyze
>>
>> what should i do..?any help
>>
>
> Please do not top post.
>
> I must be missing a post, as I see no explanation of what the query is
> doing.
>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 4:27 AM, Adrian Klaver <adrian.kla...@aklaver.com
>> <mailto:adrian.kla...@aklaver.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     On 11/03/2015 06:42 AM, Ramesh T wrote:
>>
>>         I have a Query it taking a lot of time to fetch results
>>         so,explain query gave
>>
>>         "Hash Join  (cost=55078.00..202405.95 rows=728275 width=418)"
>>         "  Hash Cond: (itd.tran_id = iad._adj__id)"
>>         "  ->  Seq Scan on inv_detail itd  (cost=0.00..40784.18
>> rows=731029
>>         width=95)"
>>         "        Filter: (event_type = ANY ('{21,22,3,5}'::integer[]))"
>>         "  ->  Hash  (cost=20590.78..20590.78 rows=610978 width=331)"
>>         "        ->  Seq Scan on inv_adj  iad  (cost=0.00..20590.78
>>         rows=610978
>>         width=331)"
>>
>>         Can you Please let me know wt happen in query..?wt should i do..
>>
>>
>>     And the query is?
>>
>>
>>     --
>>     Adrian Klaver
>>     adrian.kla...@aklaver.com <mailto:adrian.kla...@aklaver.com>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Adrian Klaver
> adrian.kla...@aklaver.com
>

Reply via email to