On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Steve Kehlet <steve.keh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 10:42 AM Jeff Janes <jeff.ja...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Vacuum is overkill (and can be extremely slow to run a large gin index), >> you just need to get it to autoanalyze by changing the per-table setting of >> "autovacuum_vacuum_scale_factor" to zero and instead using >> > > Did you mean autovacuum_analyze_scale_factor or does it not matter? > Yes, sorry. Those long names make my eyes go bleary. Cheers, Jeff