On 19 July 2015 at 09:11, Rafal Pietrak <ra...@ztk-rp.eu> wrote:

> I'm not particularly fond of using functions to accessing RDBMS instead
> of tables.
>
> And I'm not particularly fond of "workarounds".
>

Use a combination of factors (a sequence ID and the key) for your
authorization. So in the extremely unlikely event that the random key isn't
unique, it doesn't matter. That's not a workaround, it's good design.

You're asking for a feature that is completely unnecessary and is easily
resolved. UPSERT is designed for a situation which is neither.

Geoff

Reply via email to