(But don't use my format string, it's very wrong!)

On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Colin Lieberman <clieber...@turnitin.com>
wrote:

> You may be looking for to_char:
>
> # select to_char( now() - '2015-06-25', 'YYYY-MM-DD HH24:mm:ss' );
>
>        to_char
> ---------------------
>  0000-00-00 15:00:43
> (1 row)
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/static/functions-formatting.html
>
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 9:11 PM, litu16 <litumelen...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> This is my table...
>>
>> <http://postgresql.nabble.com/file/n5855074/screenshot.jpg>
>>
>> I would like to get the time difference between 'time_type = Lap' AND
>> 'time_type = Start' in order to fill 'time_elapse'. Im almost sure that
>> this
>> code works...
>>
>> *    CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION timediff()
>>       RETURNS trigger AS
>>     $BODY$
>>     DECLARE
>>     t_ix real;
>>
>>     BEGIN
>>     IF NEW.time_type = 'Lap' THEN
>>       SELECT t.time FROM table_ebscb_spa_log04 t WHERE t.fn_name =
>> NEW.fn_name AND t.time_type = 'Start' ORDER BY t.stmtserial DESC LIMIT 1
>> INTO t_ix;
>>         IF NOT FOUND THEN
>>           RAISE EXCEPTION USING MESSAGE = 'There is not any previous
>> row...';
>>         ELSE
>>           NEW.time_elapse := t_ix - NEW.time;
>>         END IF;
>>     END IF;
>>     return NEW;
>>     END
>>     $BODY$
>>       LANGUAGE plpgsql VOLATILE*
>>
>> But I don't know how to get the time difference between the two timestamps
>> cells in a special format: (years/months/days
>> hours:minutes:seconds:miliseconds) like this...
>>
>> *    0y/0m/0d   00:00:01.001*
>>
>> Is this possible??
>> Thanks Advanced.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://postgresql.nabble.com/Get-the-difference-between-two-timestamp-cells-but-in-a-special-format-in-PostgreSQL-tp5855074.html
>> Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
>> To make changes to your subscription:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>>
>
>

Reply via email to