Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 2:20 AM, Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> wrote:
>> I read through this version and found nothing to change.  I encourage other
>> hackers to study the patch, though.  The surrounding code is challenging.

> Andres tested this and discovered that my changes to
> find_multixact_start() were far more creative than intended.
> Committed and back-patched with a trivial fix for that stupidity and a
> novel-length explanation of the changes.

So where are we on this?  Are we ready to schedule a new set of
back-branch releases?  If not, what issues remain to be looked at?

                        regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

Reply via email to