So product_feature is only 1 row for each product_type, right ? Looks good.
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Adrian Stern <adrian.st...@unchained.ch> wrote: > Sorry. Will do in the future. > > Product_freature is a table describing the valid keys for product > features. With this it is possible to limit keys to specific groups of > products. > > Freundliche GrĂ¼sse > > Adrian Stern > unchained - web solutions > > adrian.st...@unchained.ch > +41 79 292 83 47 > > On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Dorian Hoxha <dorian.ho...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Please do reply-all so you also reply to the list. >> >> It's not ~good to develop with sqlite and deploy on posgresql. You should >> have your 'dev' as close to 'prod' as possible. >> >> Product_feature is another table in this case ? >> >> On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Adrian Stern <adrian.st...@unchained.ch> >> wrote: >> >>> Database changeability is not a requirement. It just comes with django >>> and makes development so much easier since I can develop on sqlite and >>> deploy the wherever I want. Django orm is not "great" I agree, but it >>> certainly does not suck, there are alternatives like sqlalchemy which are >>> far more powerful. >>> >>> But yea. I get what you're trying to tell me. And I agree, this >>> postgresql feature for jsonb look really nice. Much more easy to use than >>> the whole xquery stuff. The complete EAV Pattern described on wikipedia is >>> actually pretty complex and seems not easy at all to implement in using >>> django. Therefore, i maybe should run a few tests with the json plugins. >>> >>> So let my sketch another approach. >>> >>> PRODUCT -> P >>> - name >>> - type >>> - features (jsonb) >>> >>> PRODUCT_FEATURE -> PF >>> - name >>> - description >>> - datatype >>> - validation >>> >>> P now has the features field of type jsonb, which allows keys specified >>> in PF together with a value of "datatype" or simply a valid one. PF holds >>> the key-name, its datatype for generating the GUI, and some validation >>> pattern for input sanitizing. There is no relation between the Tables. >>> >>> Getting the description is not an issue. I could even create a view >>> mapping the jsonb keys to rows. >>> >>> Yes I like your approach. Is there anything I should be aware of? Some >>> do's and don'ts or known pitfalls? >>> >>> >> >