So we can consider this matter closed ? CallableStatements are necessary
because postgres has to use select to call a function.

Dave Cramer

dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
http://www.credativ.ca

On 4 May 2015 at 18:06, Nanker Phelge <n.phelg...@gmail.com> wrote:

> The database function does not use out parameters or a ref cursor, which
> was why I was confused.  The Java sample I provided is a simplification of
> the built-in default logic of the Spring Batch ItemWriter - I put it into
> my own implementation class to help with debugging. The root cause seems to
> be the JDBC driver thinking that there should not be results because it is
> an update and the 'select' influencing that decision.  I tried switching
> this ItemWriter implementation to use a CallableStatement, and that did
> work, but I wanted to understand why the approach I listed in the original
> post didn't work.
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Thomas Kellerer <spam_ea...@gmx.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Hannes Erven schrieb am 04.05.2015 um 12:31:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> >
>> >>          String sql = "select test_user_result_insert_func(?, ?, ?);";
>> >
>> > You can't call functions via JDBC like that.
>>
>> That's perfectly valid - unless the function uses out parameters or ref
>> cursors.
>>
>> I am however unsure about batched statements here. So trying
>> CallableStatement is definitely worth a shot.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
>> To make changes to your subscription:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>>
>
>

Reply via email to