>>> archiving run. Postgres will recycle WALs on its own when they are no >>> longer needed. Or is there is some compelling reason you want to get rid >of WALs? >> >> Ah. I didn't know that. I thought the cleanup was on me. Bonus! > >For more info take a look here: > >http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/static/wal-configuration.html
Things are running smoothly so far. The proof will be in the pudding after 48h or so. But I have changed my rsync from its original pull approach to push. I do need to clean up the WAL's on master once they've made it to the warm_standby, so in this new push approach, I only round up WAL's that are, say 10m old, and then rsync those to warm_standby, deleting them on master when they've been xferred. warm_standby continues to do a good job of cleaning up the archive dir w/o any fuss from me. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
