On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 1:03 PM Jim Nasby <jim.na...@bluetreble.com> wrote:

> On 4/12/15 11:55 PM, Sameer Kumar wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 11:35 Jim Nasby <jim.na...@bluetreble.com
> > <mailto:jim.na...@bluetreble.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     On 4/11/15 4:11 PM, Sameer Kumar wrote:
> >      >     Pg_settings currently has an upper bound column - though it
> is a
> >      >     view and that value cannot be changed that I know of.
> >      >
> >      >
> >      > I guess that upper bound column is more of the limit that is
> >     imposed by
> >      > system which you can have for a parameter i.e. the system imposed
> >     limit
> >      > or valid range if values for a parameter. I don't think one can
> >     update that.
> >
> >     Correct.
> >
> >      >     But if it could I suspect that whatever catalog you would
> >     change to
> >      >     affect it would only cause a global change. There is no alter
> >      >     database, role, or postgresql way to change that value.
> >      >
> >      > Oh ok... anyway of achieving that? There no EVENT trigger for
> >     "alter user"?
> >
> >     There is not, but as David mentioned there's way more ways to modify
> >     settings than just ALTER ROLE. Attempting to lock that down won't
> help
> >     you at all.
> >
> >     Unfortunately, there's no hook support for doing something special
> when
> >     GUCs change, though it might be possible to do something here via
> >     planner hooks. That would be pretty complicated and would need to be
> >     done in C.
> >
> >     It doesn't look like SELinux would help either.
> >
> >     So basically, there is currently no way to restrict someone changing
> >     GUCs, other than GUCs that are marked as superuser-only.
> >
> > Is there anything ecpected in any of the near future release?
>
> No. I suspect the community would support at least a hook for GUC
> changes, if not a full-on permissions system. A hook would make it
> fairly easy to add event trigger support.
>
>
I hope someone out there is listening :)

I hope I have made my concern clear, I currently don't have a way to
control users from changing the parameter values for their own settings,
which allows each user to set in-appropriate values e.g. for work_mem.


Regards
Sameer

Reply via email to